Friday, December 11, 2009

Platinum Sports Investing Blog - Friday

Sometimes it's better lucky than good.   Our total yesterday looked all
but dead after the second period but we were able to go score free
for the push.

No totals today but we have 4 big NHL plays.  Let's have a great
start to the weekend....

***PLEASE NOTE*** Those who viewed the blog earlier...I made an error and Edmonton is
NOT a play.  If you've played them I'm sorry, place a bet on the other side and we'll have to eat
the juice as I have already played my own mistake.  I'm sorry.

NHL 2009 - 2010 Puckline Version ( +39.9 Units @ $20 base)

Line 1: X-25-25-60
Line 2: 25-25-25-25-65

On the game 2 line risk 135 to win 90 on Florida +1.5 -150
On the game 1 line risk 170 to win 90 on Anaheim +1.5 -190
On the game 1 line risk 190 to win 90 on Tampa Bay +1.5 -210



Starting 11/01/2009 - NHL 2009 - 2010 Moneyline Version (+ 52.1 Units @ $20 Base)


Line 1: 25-25-25-25-25-50
Line 2: 25-25-25-25-25

On the game 2 line risk 50 to win 100 on Florida +200
On the game 1 line risk 75 to win 115 on Anaheim +155
On the game 1 line risk 75 to win 120 on Tampa Bay +160




NHL TOTALS 2009-2010 ( + 43.4 Units @ 20 Base)

Line 1: 15-15-15-15
Line 2: 15-15-15-15
Line 3: 51-15-15-15

Today we have no totals plays


To Your Success,

Tod Wilkinson

3 comments:

Unknown said...

Tod,

I don't see Edmonton as a play....they have already covered the 1.5 PL multiple times on this road trip. Dallas however is a play, aren't they? Just want to make sure we are consistent for tracking purposes.

PSIC said...

KMang...thank you I'm not sure what I was thinking at 2am when I updated the blog but edmonton is NOT a play....but NEITHER is Dallas. If a team wins with the +1.5 goals, I do not continue to follow that team on the moneyline. I add the loss to my line knowing I'll pick up that loss as other teams win for me so Dallas is NOT a play either as they did win with the +1.5 goals in their last game.

Tod

PSIC said...

Just to clarify....I make let the PUCKLINE version determine the plays. Just so everyone understands how I've been handling the moneyline version. My THEORY was that in seeing how the games would drop, knowing our average price would be very nice, we could afford to walk away from the occasional play where our team would sneak in on the puckline. So to be clear if a team COVERS on the puckline but NOT on the moneyline, I just accept that loss on our moneyline and move on.